|
Key
This line was removed.
This word was removed. This word was added.
This line was added.
|
Changes (16)
View Page History| _(part of the [InLOC work|work])_ |
| |
| h1. InLOC Guidelines approach |
| {tip:title=CEN Workshop Agreement now concluded} This will be produced as an official CEN Workshop Agreement, which will be available free of charge from the CEN web site. A link will be posted here when it is ready. All the material is available right here on this wiki, distributed across several pages for convenient reference.{tip} |
| |
| h2. Rationale |
| ---- |
| |
| For the Guidelines to be useful towards adoption of the InLOC outputs, they must provide the information stakeholders want and need, to complement the other outputs. The approach we are taking is designed to maximise the input from stakeholders, and the relevance of the Guidelines to them, and therefore to optimally promote the adoption of the InLOC outputs. |
| h1. InLOC — Guidelines including the integration of Learning Outcomes and Competences into existing specifications |
| |
| h2. Contents of the Guidelines |
| The originally envisaged title of the deliverable was "Guidelines for the Integration of Learning Outcomes and Competences into existing ELM specifications". This has been changed to reflect the broader scope of the actual deliverable. |
| |
| The contents will be adapted both to incorporate the input we elicit from stakeholders, and to include what individual experts can contribute. Here is our starting point for the interim deliverable, June 2012. |
| h2. Contents |
| |
| # [InLOC scope]: helps readers understand whether the Guidelines are relevant to them. # [Terms and Definitions]: common with the IM. # [Stakeholder groups]: these are identified so that they can recognise themselves; and it sets out what InLOC offers each group. # [Learning outcomes] in Learning Education and Training: gives background on how learning outcomes are currently represented in practice, and the future potential for use. # [Work competences]: gives some context on current employment practices, and future potential use cases and business cases. # [Explaining InLOC] in detail: explaining the InLOC model features in terms of real examples. The e-CF will be used as a central example, with other examples of learning outcomes used to supplement it where it lacks particular features. # [Applying InLOC]: to learning, education and training; to some employment practices; and to the relationships and interface between them -- including guidance and mobility of learners, and helping learners move into employment. # [Integrating InLOC] with European standards and processes: explains how the InLOC approach complements Europass (including EuroLMAI), MLO, the e-CF, and other related processes. |
| # [An introduction to the InLOC Guidelines|Guidelines introduction] # [The relevance of InLOC to different stakeholders|Stakeholder groups] # [Background to InLOC – learning outcomes in learning education and training|Learning outcomes] # [Background to InLOC – competence in the world of employment|Work competences] # [An example to explain the InLOC Information Model|InLOC explained through example] #* [The distinction between definitions and structures of LOCs|InLOC explained through example#ThedistinctionbetweendefinitionsandstructuresofLOCs] #* [LOC associations|InLOC explained through example#LOCassociations] #* [Defining proficiency levels and generic levels|InLOC explained through example#Definingproficiencylevelsandgenericlevels] #* [Properties of LOCstructure and LOCdefinition|InLOC explained through example#PropertiesofLOCstructureandLOCdefinition] #* [Direct properties of LOCdefinitions and LOCstructures|InLOC explained through example#DirectpropertiesofLOCdefinitionsandLOCstructures] #* [Modelling optionality|InLOC explained through example#Modellingoptionality] #* [Handling multilinguality|InLOC explained through example#Handlingmultilinguality] # [How to follow InLOC in the structuring of LOC information|How to follow InLOC] #* [Recognising LOC definitions|How to follow InLOC#RecognisingLOCdefinitions] #* [Identifying the LOC structure|How to follow InLOC#IdentifyingtheLOCstructure] #* [Associating your definitions within the structure|How to follow InLOC#Associatingyourdefinitionswithinthestructure] #* [More information about your structure or framework|How to follow InLOC#Moreinformationaboutyourstructureorframework] #* [Compound properties that have some structure|How to follow InLOC#Compoundpropertiesthathavesomestructure] #* [What to leave out|How to follow InLOC#Whattoleaveout] #* Important information that is often not represented in paper documentation # [Extending InLOC]: how InLOC allows for unspecified features to be added in. # [Referencing InLOC information] from related information represented in different ways. # [Integrating InLOC with European Learner Mobility specifications|Integrating InLOC]: explains how InLOC can work with Europass (including EuroLMAI), MLO, and related specifications. #* [MLO|Integrating InLOC#MLO] #* [EuroLMAI and the Europass Diploma Supplement|Integrating InLOC#EuroLMAIandtheEuropassDiplomaSupplement] #* [Integrating InLOC with ELMO|Integrating InLOC#IntegratingInLOCwithELMO] #* [Integration with the Europass CV and Language Passport|Integrating InLOC#IntegrationwiththeEuropassCVandLanguagePassport] #* [The Europass Certificate Supplement|Integrating InLOC#TheEuropassCertificateSupplement] # [List of references|Grefs] #* Further Reading |
| |
| The interim version of the guidelines will not fully cover Application Profiles or Bindings, because the work in these areas is scheduled for after the interim drafts have been distributed. The standardization agenda in the InLOC areas, and recommendations for future development, will be reported on to the Workshop, but are not seen as appropriate for Guidelines aimed at users of the InLOC outputs. |
| ---- |
| h2. Approach to composition Work on the Guidelines will depend on input received from stakeholders, and information collated from other sources. These are covered in the [stakeholders] work. The team will review and confirm agreement about the chapter and section headings for the guidelines, aiming to cover stakeholder wants and needs but without unnecessary extra material, and these will be revised in the light of the information actually elicited from stakeholders. Team members will then draft material relevant to the stakeholders they are engaged with. The Guidelines will then be assembled and edited to comprise a draft CWA, submitted with the Interim Report, by 2012-06-15. This interim version will not fully cover work on Application Profiles or Bindings. Team members will present the interim Guidelines to their stakeholders, and gather feedback from them. This vital feedback will be used in improving the Guidelines to meet the needs of stakeholders, and to make adoption most likely. Responding fully to feedback from the Workshop and others, and integrating material relevant to the Application Profiles and Bindings, the final version will be prepared in good time for endorsement by the January 2013 meeting of the Workshop. |